Saturday, May 20, 2017
Adam Smith and Human Flourishing
Adam Smith was known as the champion of economic freedom. He had made three claims that has to do with human flourishing. The three claims were economic, political, and moral flourishing. These were taken from a book that Smith had written called “The Wealth of Nations”.
Economic flourishing is probably the one topic that Smith knew and wanted to educate people on. Only once did Adam smith use the term flourishing in its traditional, philosophical sense referring to the healthy state of a society or individual. This was during a passage where Smith intervened in a current debate over the desirability of "improvement in the circumstances of the lower ranks of the people”. Smith argued that the market was desirable because it alleviates the condition of the poor and helps to realize the flourishing society. He made it clear in the first chapter of The Wealth of Nations that the superiority of a well-governed society consists of "universal opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of people" and can then ensure that "a general plenty diffuses itself through all the different ranks of the society."
Political flourishing was only discussed slightly in the article about Smith. He didn’t really have the same kind of mind that other political leaders did. He was compared to Aristotle because they had had the same thinking style. Also in another book that Adam Smith had written called “The Theory of Moral Sentiments”, Smith had compared two different types of societies. In the first type of society, the members of the first society stand in need of each other's assistance and are exposed to mutual injuries. The necessary assistance is reciprocally afforded from love, gratitude, friendship, and esteem. The society flourishes and is happy. Then, in the second society, the members of the second society show no mutual love and affection towards one another and the society is less happy and agreeable. However, it will not necessarily be any less than the first. Society can subsist from a sense of utility without any love or affection and still be upheld by a mercenary exchange of good offices per an agreed valuation.
In the first line of The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Smith states "How selfish soever man may be supposed there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing it". Smith began his book this way to make it clear that our happiness and the happiness of others are intimately bound up with each other. An individual can only be happy and flourish when those around him are happy and flourish. Smith said that "He (man) is sensible too that his own interest is connected with the prosperity of society, and that the happiness, perhaps the preservation of his existence, depends on its preservation”. He claims that our existence depends on the existence of society, but also that we flourish when we see others around us flourish.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment